🌀The Power of Words: Telling Experiences, Painting the World We Aim For

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

It is important to create a common language by using "verbs" to describe the experience and the world we are aiming for. The meaning of words is not a point, but a distribution, and it is thought that as people repeatedly take actions for and against the same short sentence and visualize how it compares to the world's opinions, they will gradually become aligned with the same distribution.

It is difficult to verbalize what you do not understand, but it is important to write it down first, even if it is just a list of fragmented keywords. Even if you think you are reading, you are only looking at it. So, even if you don't understand the meaning, you have to put it into your mind by moving your hands and typing with the keyboard.

It takes a lot of strength of mind to continue this muddy work. I often feel like giving up halfway through because my heart is not in proportion to the effort. This is because the effort is not proportional to the results. Therefore, I recommend that you set a goal that is achievable in hours or pages. Do not make understanding your goal. If you don't understand anything, it is because you are taking on a target that is difficult to understand.

The fragment "Clarification of Objectives" describes the importance of goal setting. This is relevant to my research. It is also related to my research in that making a "condensed memo" is easier to judge because it is more tangible.

Given the relevance of the "superficial coined words" fragment, it seems important that the concepts to which the words refer be useful when creating the words. Also, considering the relevance of the "judging by action" fragment, it seems that not only the words but also the actions are important. From these perspectives, what factors should be emphasized when creating the words?

Also, given the relevance of the "post-LLM worldview" fragment, it would seem that training in expressing one's experiences in words is important. But how should that training be conducted? And what do we think we can gain through that training?

extra info

generated: 2023-09-03 07:36

previous notes

🤖🔁The power of words: telling experiences, painting the world we aspire to

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

new title: The Power of Words: Telling Experiences, Painting the World We Aim For

It is important to create a common language by using "verbs" to describe the experience and the world we are aiming for. Meanings are written as needed, avoiding definitions that are not grounded. Also, words are handles of meaning, and the process of creating them is often a metaphor or parable. The meaning of a word is not a point, but a distribution, and it is thought that as people repeatedly take actions for and against the same short sentence and visualize how it compares to the world's opinion, they will gradually align to the same distribution.

It is difficult to verbalize what you do not understand, but it is important to write it down first, even if it is just a list of fragmented keywords. Even if you think you are reading, you are only looking at it. So, even if you don't understand the meaning, you have to put it into your mind by moving your hands and typing with the keyboard.

It takes a lot of strength of mind to continue this muddy work. I often feel like giving up halfway through because my heart is not in proportion to the effort. This is because the effort is not proportional to the results. Therefore, I recommend that you set a goal that is achievable in hours or pages. Do not make understanding your goal. If you don't understand anything, it is because you are taking on a target that is difficult to understand.

The fragment "Clarification of Objectives" describes the importance of goal setting. This is relevant to my research. It is also related to my research in that making a "condensed memo" is easier to judge because it is more tangible.

Considerations and questions

Given the relevance of the "superficial coined words" fragment, it seems important that the concepts to which the words refer be useful when creating the words. Also, considering the relevance of the "judging by action" fragment, it seems that not only the words but also the actions are important. From these perspectives, what factors should be emphasized when creating the words?

Also, given the relevance of the "post-LLM worldview" fragment, it would seem that training in expressing one's experiences in words is important. But how should that training be conducted? And what do we think we can gain through that training?

extra info

generated: 2023-08-31 21:40

previous notes

🤖🔁The difference between "made" and "used".

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

It is important to create a common language by using "verbs" to describe the experience and the world we are aiming for. Meanings are not explained from the beginning, but are written as needed. It is difficult to avoid definitions that are not grounded and to target searches for things that have not yet been put into words. It is required to carve sentences into concentrated parts of meaning.

In the fragment "I made it" vs. "I use it," there is a discussion about whether wiki refers to software or to a website built using wiki software, which is relevant to my research. In "I would like to consider an explanation of the ability to create a map of the Regroup from chat logs," it is suggested that the text be chopped into meaning-enriched parts.

Words are handles of meaning, and the process of making them is often a metaphor or parable. However, the words function as handles that make it easier to manipulate one's thoughts. It is important to pay attention to bodily sensations, experiences, and discomforts that have not yet been translated into words.

The meaning of words is not a point, but a distribution, and it is thought that as people repeatedly take actions for and against the same short sentence and visualize how it compares to other opinions in the world, they will gradually become aligned with the same distribution.

It is difficult to verbalize what we do not understand. It is absurd to try to explain it in neat and tidy words. It is important to first try to write it down, even if it is just a list of fragmentary keywords.

You may think you are reading, but you are merely looking at it. So, even if you don't understand the meaning, you have to put it into your mind by moving your hands and typing on the keyboard. In the process of doing so, you may be surprised to find that you can understand it.

It takes a lot of strength of mind to continue this muddy work. I often feel like giving up halfway through because the effort is not proportional to the result. There is no guarantee that if you spend 10 hours copying sutras, you will be able to understand the language you are copying. No matter how much effort you put in, you may end up not understanding anything. This will not give you a sense of accomplishment. Therefore, we recommend that you set an achievable goal in terms of time or pages. For example, "I will now copy sutras without looking away for 30 minutes," or "Today I will write down the formulas in chapter 1 and verse 1. This can be accomplished with effort and gives you a sense of accomplishment. Do not make understanding your goal. If you don't understand anything, it is because you are challenging a target that is difficult to understand. Rather, rejoice in the fact that you are lucky if you understand something simply by transcribing it.

Now, let's say you cut the information about the unknown into bite-sized pieces and swallow them.

extra info

generated: 2023-08-29 19:27

previous notes

🤖🔁The difference between "made" and "used".

Use "verbs" to describe the experience and the world you are aiming for.

lingua franca

Instead of explaining the meaning from the beginning

Meaning will be written as needed.

Avoid down-to-earth definitions

What is not yet a word cannot be the subject of a search.

Chop sentences into meaning enriched parts.

Exactly what we are doing now.

Perceived meaning serves a necessary function for cognition.

Meaning of the word

segmentation

Evolution of Search

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

A wiki is not a dictionary, but a tool to use "verbs" to describe experiences and the world you are aiming to create. The word title page also helps create a common language for the team. This takes the approach that instead of explaining the meaning of a word from the beginning, the sentence is written first and then the meaning of the word is written as needed. This avoids groundless definitions.

The report also discusses the top page of individual projects and the difficulty of targeting things that have not yet been worded. In particular, the problem that "things that have not yet been put into words" cannot be the subject of a search is pointed out.

In the fragment "IT Engineers are Engineers, Wikipedia is Wiki?" there is a discussion about whether Wiki refers to software or to websites built using Wiki software, which is relevant to my research.

In "I would like to come up with an explanation for the ability to create a map of the Regroup from chat logs," it is suggested that [Chop sentences into meaning enriched parts. This is related to my research.

In "Forced to Use to Organize Tasks," there is a discussion of word types, which is also relevant to my research.

On the "felt meaning" performing a specific function necessary for cognition," there is a discussion of the meaning and segmentation of words, which is also relevant to my research.

Considerations and questions

How can we clarify specific wiki applications and procedures, specific guidelines and procedures for the creation of word title pages, and specific applications of the evolution of search and the need for languageization? Also, what approaches can be used to explore in depth the relevance of fragments?

extra info

generated: 2023-08-28 07:13

previous notes

🤖🔁The difference between "made" and "used".

nishio.icon

Wiki

Wiki is not a dictionary

speak with verbs

Use "verbs" rather than "nouns" to describe the design of the experience and the world you are aiming to create

Also, the difference between "make" and "use".

Different perspectives indicated by each expression

Sapir-Whorf hypothesis

Different languages and cultures have different names.

The relationship between language and thought

It is important to think deeply about the use of "nouns" and "verbs."

Vigilance and usefulness

Choice and Use of Words

Word title pages help teams create [lingua franca

Someone writes a messy sentence.

Write a description on the link.

Avoids being defined on the ground.

Wiki as a living text

Agile Development

It's made when it's needed.

How the top page of an individual project should look like

Difficulty in targeting what is not in words

Evolution of Search

Considerations and questions

The "Wiki is not a dictionary" fragment offers a new perspective on how to utilize wikis. However, specific methods and procedures for utilizing wikis have not been clarified. How can specific methods and procedures of utilization be clarified?

The "Don't Fear Word Title Pages" fragment also describes vigilance in creating word title pages and their usefulness. However, it does not provide specific guidelines or procedures for creating a word title page. How can specific guidelines or procedures be provided?

Finally, the fragment "20191011 Tachikawa-Nishio Chat Memo" talks about the evolution of search and the need for language. However, it is not clear how these perspectives can be specifically utilized. How can we clarify how to utilize these perspectives in concrete ways?

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

Wiki as a Living Text" examines the use of wikis from the perspective of agile development. It also touches on the nature of the top page of an individual project and the difficulty of targeting what is not in words.

In "Speaking with Verbs," he explains the importance of using "verbs" rather than "nouns" to describe the design of an experience and the world it aims to create. It also discusses the difference between "make" and "use," pointing out the different perspectives that each expression represents.

Citing the "Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis," he points out that different languages and cultures have different names. He concludes that it is important to think deeply about the relationship between language and thought, especially the use of "nouns" and "verbs.

In "A Wiki is Not a Dictionary," he points out the problems with viewing a wiki as a metaphor for a dictionary. This is related to the "Wiki as a living text" perspective and promotes a deeper understanding of how wikis can be used.

In "Don't Fear the Word Title Page," he discusses vigilance in creating word title pages and their usefulness. It is related to the "verbatim" perspective and promotes a deeper understanding of word choice and use.

In "20191011 Tachikawa Nishio Chat Memo," he talks about the evolution of search and the need for language. This is related to the viewpoint that "what has not yet been put into words" cannot be targeted, and promotes a deeper understanding of the relationship between language and thought.

Considerations and questions

The "Wiki is not a dictionary" fragment offers a new perspective on how to utilize wikis. However, specific methods and procedures for utilizing wikis have not been clarified. How can specific methods and procedures of utilization be clarified?

The "Don't Fear Word Title Pages" fragment also describes vigilance in creating word title pages and their usefulness. However, it does not provide specific guidelines or procedures for creating a word title page. How can specific guidelines or procedures be provided?

Finally, the fragment "20191011 Tachikawa-Nishio Chat Memo" talks about the evolution of search and the need for language. However, it is not clear how these perspectives can be specifically utilized. How can we clarify how to utilize these perspectives in concrete ways?

extra info

generated: 2023-08-25 07:15

previous notes

🤖🔁The difference between "made" and "used".

Wiki as a living text

Agile Development

speak with verbs

Experience Design

The World We Aim For

Use "verbs" instead of "nouns."

Difference between "make" and "use."

Those who describe themselves as "using" see themselves as tools.

Those who describe "continue" as something that should be continued

What the top page of a personal project should look like

Cannot target "that which has not yet been put into words."

He cites the "Sapir-Whorf hypothesis," noting that different languages and cultures have different names.

It is important to think deeply about the relationship between language and thought, especially the use of "nouns" and "verbs"

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

Wiki as a Living Text" adopts the idea of agile development, while "Talking with Verbs" emphasizes the importance of using "verbs" rather than "nouns" when discussing the world we aim for in the design of experiences. The difference between "making" and "using" is that those who describe "using" see it as a tool, while those who describe "continuing" see it as something that should be continued. There are two ways people react to new tools.

In "Organizing the Home Page Conduit," we discuss what the home page of a personal project should look like. In "The Post-LLM Worldview," we advocate the idea that "what has not yet been put into words" cannot be the subject. In "Language Modeling Experiment 2018-09-28," we try a method that gives one word and then generates 20 words. In "20191011 Tachikawa Nishio," we propose sharing current information rather than requests as a proposed action. In "Developing a 'Japanese Cultural AI': Plurality for Global Deliberation," the authors cite the "Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis" and point out that different languages and cultures have different names.

Thinks deeply

From these notes and fragments, I feel it is important to think deeply about the relationship between language and thought, especially the use of "nouns" and "verbs". I also find it interesting to learn more about the development of "Japanese cultural AI."

1. can you explain the use of "nouns" and "verbs" with specific examples?

2. what are some specific ways to realize the development of "Japanese cultural AI"?

3. how do you think we should address the differences in people's reactions to the new tool?

4. do you have any specific evaluation of the results of the "Language Modeling Experiment 2018-09-28"?

5. for "20191011 Tachikawa Nishio," "Proposed action: instead of a request (instruction for action), how about sharing information about the current situation?" What are some concrete ways to implement this regarding "20191011 Tachikawa Nishio"?

extra info

generated: 2023-08-24 12:42

previous notes

🤖🔁The difference between "made" and "used".

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

The "Wiki as a Living Text" adopts an agile development philosophy that does not separate the creation and use phases. Speaking with Verbs" emphasizes the importance of using "verbs" rather than "nouns" when discussing the world we aim to create in the design of an experience. When we call it by nouns, we recognize it as something that does not change, but when we talk about it with verbs, we see it as something that changes.

The difference between "making" and "using" is that those who describe themselves as "using" see it as a tool, while those who describe themselves as "continuing" see it as something that should be continued. Those who speak of "wanting to make," but never actually make anything, do so because they "want to be the one who made it."

There are two ways people react to new tools. Some people quickly learn how to use the tool and enjoy using it. Others, on the other hand, feel frustrated and are content to argue with others who feel the same way, saying, "This isn't working.

"Organize the home page lead-in" discusses what the home page of a personal project should look like. The "Cut out the excitement" section focuses on the excitement.

In "The Post-LLM Worldview," he advocates the notion that "what is not yet verbalized" cannot be subjected to It also states that visual thinking precedes verbal thinking.

In the "Language Modeling Experiment 2018-09-28," we are trying a method that gives one word and then generates 20 words.

In "20191011 Tachikawa Nishio," we suggest sharing current information rather than requests as a proposed action. It also emphasizes the need to verbalize the issues.

In "Developing a Japanese Cultural AI: Plurality for Global Deliberation," he cites the "Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis" and points out that different languages and cultures have different names. It also advocates the development of a "Japanese cultural AI.

Thinks deeply

From these notes and fragments, I feel it is important to think deeply about the relationship between language and thought, especially the use of "nouns" and "verbs". We also find the opening of the "Japanese Culture AI" interesting. The idea is that Japanese speakers can hold deliberations in Japanese and share the results with people around the world through AI. This may prevent loss of thought due to language and cultural differences.

1. can you explain the use of "nouns" and "verbs" with specific examples?

2. what are some specific ways to realize the development of "Japanese cultural AI"?

3. how do you think we should address the differences in people's reactions to the new tool?

4. do you have any specific evaluation of the results of the "Language Modeling Experiment 2018-09-28"?

5. for "20191011 Tachikawa Nishio," "Proposed action: instead of a request (instruction for action), how about sharing information about the current situation?" What are some concrete ways to implement this regarding "20191011 Tachikawa Nishio"?

extra info

generated: 2023-08-24 07:30

previous notes

🤖🔁The difference between "made" and "used".

Furthermore, "Wiki as a Living Text" discusses the concept of agile development, in which the phases of creating and using are not separated, but rather proceeded in parallel and gradually.

"Speaking with Verbs" points out the importance of using "verbs" rather than "nouns" when discussing the world we are aiming for in the design of our experiences.

When we call it by a noun, we implicitly recognize it as unchanging

When we speak in verbs, we see it as something that changes.

A wiki is a living text because it behaves as a changing text, not as a collection of fixed articles

As a form of human-AI interaction

Other Summary

Those who describe themselves as "using" = they see it as a tool.

Those who express "continue" = see it as something that should be continued.

They say "I want to create," but never actually create anything, not because they want to, but because they want to be the one who created it.

People's reactions to new tools

Some people say, "Wow, what's this, how does it work?" or "What, you can do that? How do you do that?" and in no time at all, they learn how to use the tool and enjoy using it.

Another person feels dissatisfied, saying, "What's this? I don't understand it," or "It's not good, this part is not good, it should be improved," and is satisfied with saying, "This is not good," with someone who feels the same thing.

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

We examined the difference between "make" and "use," and confirmed that different mental models exist for each. We also found a connection between Nishio's mental models of "use" and "continue.

We also discussed "those who have never made anything they wanted to make." This refers to people who say they want to make something, but never actually make anything.

Wiki as a Living Text" discusses the concept of agile development, in which the phases of creating and using are not separated, but rather proceeded in parallel and gradually.

In "Speaking with Verbs," he points out the importance of using "verbs" rather than "nouns" when discussing the world we are aiming for in the design of our experiences.

In "Don't Present What You Won't Use," he points out the problem with presenting what you won't actually use.

In "Two Ways to Behave Toward the New," he discusses the differences in people's reactions to new tools.

From the above discussion, we have learned that there are different mental models for the act of creating, the act of using, and the act of continuing to use them. We also gained a deeper understanding of factors that influence people's actions and thoughts, such as the problems of presenting something that one does not actually use, and the different reactions people have to new tools.

extra info

generated: 2023-08-23 20:37

previous notes

🤖🔁The difference between "made" and "used".

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

We discussed the difference between "created" and "using." This refers to the difference between the act of creating something and the act of using something that already exists. We also found a connection with Nishio's research note mental models of "using" and "continuing". This discusses the difference between those who describe themselves as "using" and those who describe themselves as "not continuing.

We also discussed "people who have never made anything because they wanted to make it". This refers to those who speak of "wanting to create," but in reality only have a yearning to be "the one who created," but never actually create anything.

Furthermore, "Wiki as a Living Text" discusses the concept of agile development, in which the phases of creating and using are not separated, but rather proceed in parallel and gradually.

In "Speaking with Verbs," he points out the importance of using "verbs" rather than "nouns" when discussing the world we are aiming for in the design of our experiences.

In "Don't Present What You Won't Use," he points out the problem with presenting what you won't actually use.

In "Two Ways to Behave Toward the New," he discusses the differences in people's reactions to new tools.

From the above discussion, we have learned that there are different mental models for the act of creating, the act of using, and the act of continuing to use them. We also gained a deeper understanding of factors that influence people's actions and thoughts, such as the problems of presenting something that one does not actually use, and the different reactions people have to new tools.

extra info

generated: 2023-08-23 14:28

previous notes

🤖🔁The difference between "made" and "used".

Difference between "made" and "using."

__BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED__

It is important to create a common language by using "verbs" to describe the experience and the world we are aiming for. The meaning of words is not a point, but a distribution, and it is thought that as people repeatedly take actions for and against the same short sentence and visualize how it compares to the world's opinions, they will gradually become aligned with the same distribution.

It is difficult to verbalize what you do not understand, but it is important to write it down first, even if it is just a list of fragmented keywords. Even if you think you are reading, you are only looking at it. So, even if you don't understand the meaning, you have to put it into your mind by moving your hands and typing with the keyboard.

It takes a lot of strength of mind to continue this muddy work. I often feel like giving up halfway through because my heart is not in proportion to the effort. This is because the effort is not proportional to the results. Therefore, I recommend that you set a goal that is achievable in hours or pages. Do not make understanding your goal. If you don't understand anything, it is because you are taking on a target that is difficult to understand.

The "nullify nominalization" fragment is associated with the idea of the meaning of a word as a distribution. The "tentative word" fragment is also associated with the attempt to verbalize the unknowable.

The "page as a fluid process" fragment is relevant in that it is important to think deeply about the relationship between language and thought, especially the use of "nouns" and "verbs."

deep thinking

In creating words, it seems important that the concepts to which they refer are useful. In addition, not only the words but also the actions are considered to be important. From these perspectives, what factors should be emphasized when creating words?

The Importance of Words and Actions and Their Balance."

extra info

generated: 2023-09-13 07:14

__BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED__

It is important to create a common language by using "verbs" to describe experiences and the world we aspire to. The meaning of words is distribution, and it is thought that opinions will come together through repeated actions for and against. It is difficult to verbalize what is not understood, but it is important to write it down first, even if it is just a list of fragmented keywords. It is recommended to set a goal that is achievable in time and pages, not understanding as a goal.

Fragments "clarity of purpose," "superficial coining," "judging by action," and "post-LLM worldview" are all relevant. These provide an opportunity to think about goal setting, word making, the importance of action, and the discipline of expressing one's experiences in words.

Behind the Scenes of Thinking: Between Thinking and Communicating" and "Words for Thinking and Words for Communicating" emphasize the difference between expression and communication and are relevant to the notes. Empirically Obvious" is related to fragments such as "Experience Speaks for Itself" and "Concrete Experience," and describes knowledge and understanding based on experience and experience, its verbalization and sharing.

deep thinking

The choice of language between expression and delivery is critical to effective communication. Knowledge and understanding based on experiences and experiences vary according to individual perspectives and backgrounds, and verbalizing and sharing them is an important step.

summary of thoughts

The choice of language between expression and delivery is critical to effective communication."

"Linguizing and Sharing Experience: Its Cost and Value."

Expression and Communication: The Importance of Language Choice."

"Linguizing and Sharing Experience: Its Cost and Value."

extra info

generated: 2023-10-10 07:09

---